People Like Us

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Must Read: The Mechanics of Field Reports (FR)

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Administrator
Status: Offline
Posts: 2318
Date:

Must Read: The Mechanics of Field Reports (FR)

Permalink Closed

What are FRs?

FRs or Field Reports are testimonies from clients in where they narrate the experience of the time spent with a model and express their sentiments of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of the encounter. Of course, ideally, it should be truthful, and a number are. However, there are those who have strayed from this ideal, motivated by reasons of their own. Some are caught and called out by those who have noticed the inconsistencies, others go unnoticed. So, it is up to the reader to discern where the truth lies. 

 

What are FRs for?

FRs serve as a counterbalance to protect the consumers. In it you can air out your delight or grievances which is actually a powerful tool as it greatly affects their hiring rate and could make or break a masseur. After all, what do you think is a more gut-wrenching punishment? The administration slapping them with some silent penalty? Or being featured in a site but with no takers; their misdemeanors laid out for the world to see; forced to carry their infamy to the depths of their grave? The masseurs know this all too well, so they are careful with their dealings, which in turn protects the clients. 

 

How to analyze FRs?

There are FRs that are truthful, the trick is to find which ones. My advice is to either get acquainted with those who are known to be credible or you may also study the general pattern of the thread; are they mostly negative or mostly positive? Do the good/bad FRs come from different individuals and perhaps backed up by a few credible personalities or do they all come from a singular source as part of a praise release/smear campaign? 

However, even if there are countless outstanding FRs in a thread, this does not "assure" you a great time. Why? Because we should not forget that we are all unique and these testimonies were written to reflect the writers personal state of mind, expectations, and threshold for satisfaction. We all have our personal criteria of what is satisfactory, so what may have been spectacular for one, may not be for another. 

And let us also not forget the point of view of the model. In as much as some would want to believe that they are robots created to obey every whim we desire, they are people with inherent personalities and preferences. True, because of the nature of their profession, they should learn to accommodate all personalities, but the reality is they also have their limits and they cannot accommodate every type of personality that exist, and if you happen to be one of the unlucky few, that could explain why you experienced a different treatment from the rest. 

Overall, all FRs could truly provide is guidance to increase your chances of achieving that elusive 'hit' encounter, but to go so far as to get a 100% "assurance", I do not think that is possible.

 

Is it true that bad FRs are less well-received?

Yes, bad FRs are not as well-received as its counterpart, but that is human nature; we tend to welcome good news with glad tidings and abhor bad news. But we are not discouraging the postings of bad FRs, all you need is convincing evidence and your detractors will be forced to hold their tongue. 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard